The Iran War: Unpacking What Really Ignited The Conflict

Consuelo Halvorson MD 20 Jun 2025

The world watches with bated breath as the conflict between Iran and Israel escalates, a direct confrontation marking a new, dangerous chapter in Middle Eastern geopolitics. Understanding what started the Iran War is crucial to grasping the complexities and potential ramifications of this unfolding crisis.

This article delves into the intricate web of historical grievances, strategic objectives, and immediate triggers that culminated in the current large-scale direct conflict, examining the key events and actors that propelled these two long-standing adversaries into open warfare. It's a narrative shaped by decades of simmering tensions, strategic calculations, and a relentless pursuit of security, culminating in a dramatic escalation that has captured global attention.

Table of Contents:

1. A History of Hostility: The Long Road to Conflict
- 1.1. Echoes of Past Conflicts: The Iran-Iraq War
2. The Nuclear Question: A Decades-Long Standoff
3. Operation Rising Lion: The Spark on June 12th
- 3.1. Israeli Objectives and Initial Strikes
4. Iran's Retaliation: Missiles and Declarations of War
5. Escalation Beyond Borders: Cyber Warfare and Wider Strikes
- 5.1. The Shadow War Comes to Light
6. The American Stance: A Complex Alliance
7. The Human Cost: Civilians in the Crosshairs
8. A New Era of Direct Confrontation

1. A History of Hostility: The Long Road to Conflict

To truly understand what started the Iran War, one must first acknowledge the deep-seated animosity and strategic rivalry that has characterized the relationship between Iran and Israel for decades. While the recent direct confrontations are unprecedented in their scale, the groundwork for this conflict has been laid over many years through proxy wars, covert operations, and a relentless war of words. Iran has frequently pointed fingers at Israel for various incidents, including assassinations of its nuclear scientists and attacks on its infrastructure, though Israel rarely claims responsibility for such actions. This environment of unacknowledged aggression has fostered a climate of mistrust and perpetual readiness for conflict, making the question of what started the Iran War a complex tapestry of historical grievances and immediate provocations.

1.1. Echoes of Past Conflicts: The Iran-Iraq War

The region's history is replete with conflicts that continue to cast long shadows. The Iran-Iraq War, a brutal eight-year conflict from 1980 to 1988, serves as a poignant reminder of the devastating consequences of regional hostilities. Tensions between Iran and Iraq, for instance, began almost immediately after the establishment of the latter nation in 1921, in the aftermath of World War I. By the 1970s, one enduring source of conflict involved border disputes and ideological differences. The war itself began when Iraq invaded Iran, making rapid progress before being halted in the Iranian desert. Both sides engaged in the 'war of the cities,' a horrific period that saw hundreds of thousands of civilians killed. After two years, Iran had recaptured its territories and cut Iraq off from the sea ports, showcasing the immense human and strategic costs of prolonged warfare. This historical context is vital because it illustrates the region's propensity for protracted and destructive conflicts, and how perceptions of who started the war can persist for generations, fueling future animosities. Even today, some observers, while they may revile Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's Iran, also have little sympathy for Iraq, which they believe started that devastating war, highlighting the enduring nature of historical blame.

2. The Nuclear Question: A Decades-Long Standoff

At the heart of the escalating tensions and a primary factor in understanding what started the Iran War is Iran's nuclear program. For years, this program has been a flashpoint, with Israel viewing it as an existential threat. While Iran insists it does not want to create a nuclear weapon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been adamant that the only way to stop Iran from developing such a weapon is by going to war. This fundamental disagreement has driven much of the covert conflict and diplomatic efforts over the past two decades. Israel's consistent stance has been that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable, leading to a strategy of pre-emptive action and sabotage aimed at delaying or dismantling Iran's nuclear capabilities. This deep-seated fear and strategic imperative have undoubtedly played a pivotal role in the series of events that eventually led to the current direct confrontation, making the nuclear question an undeniable catalyst in what started the Iran War.

3. Operation Rising Lion: The Spark on June 12th

The immediate catalyst for the current large-scale conflict, and the definitive answer to what started the Iran War in its current phase, can be pinpointed to June 12th. On this pivotal day, Israel launched a major air campaign targeting Iran's nuclear program and leadership. USA Today reports that these are the events that eventually led to the current war, which started on June 12th with Israel's Operation Rising Lion. This operation specifically targeted Iran’s nuclear, energy, and military infrastructure, and tragically resulted in the killing of top officials, generals, and scientists. On the evening of June 12th, Israel launched a series of major strikes against Iran, signaling a dramatic shift from covert operations to overt military action. This was not merely a warning shot; it was a comprehensive and devastating assault designed to cripple Iran's strategic capabilities and leadership. The sheer scale and precision of these initial strikes marked a significant escalation, leaving no doubt about Israel's intent to directly confront what it perceived as an imminent threat.

3.1. Israeli Objectives and Initial Strikes

Operation Rising Lion, as it’s been called, began shortly after midnight on June 13th when the Israeli military struck more than 100 nuclear and military targets in Iran. The targets included Iranian nuclear facilities, missile sites, and multiple senior military and political officials. The precision and breadth of these attacks were unprecedented, resulting in the killing of hundreds of Iranians, including several military leaders. In a televised speech, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared success, emphasizing the strategic importance of these strikes in neutralizing a perceived threat. The stated objective was to deal damaging blows to Iran’s nuclear weapons program and to take out key scientific and military personnel, thereby setting back Iran's capabilities significantly. This aggressive pre-emptive strike by Israel was a calculated risk, aimed at achieving a decisive advantage, but it also carried the inherent risk of provoking a full-scale retaliation, which it did. The immediate aftermath of these strikes clearly delineates the beginning of the open conflict, making Operation Rising Lion a critical event in understanding what started the Iran War.

4. Iran's Retaliation: Missiles and Declarations of War

The Israeli strikes on June 12th and 13th did not go unanswered. Iran, viewing these attacks as a direct act of aggression, labelled them a declaration of war. In response, Iran responded with its own missile salvoes in recent days, demonstrating its capacity to strike back and signaling its resolve not to be deterred. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated that Israel should anticipate a severe punishment, while its foreign minister echoed the sentiment, calling the strikes a declaration of war. This strong rhetoric was quickly followed by concrete action. Iran responded with a series of retaliatory strikes on Israel that have resulted in 24 Israeli deaths, highlighting the immediate and tragic human cost of this escalation. Furthermore, Israeli media widely reported that Israeli targets, including the defense ministry, were hit hours after Iranian missiles breached Iron Dome to strike crucial sites in central Tel Aviv. This successful penetration of Israel's advanced air defense system underscored the severity of Iran's response and its ability to inflict damage, further cementing the direct, large-scale nature of the conflict that has now engulfed both nations. The swift and forceful Iranian retaliation is a crucial element in comprehending what started the Iran War as a full-blown military confrontation.

5. Escalation Beyond Borders: Cyber Warfare and Wider Strikes

Beyond the conventional missile and air strikes, the conflict between Iran and Israel has also manifested in the digital realm, adding another layer of complexity to what started the Iran War. The new phase of this conflict, which began on June 13th with a huge wave of Israeli strikes on Iran, also involved significant cyber dimensions. These strikes were aimed at dealing damaging blows to Iran’s nuclear weapons program and taking out key scientific and military assets, but the methods employed extended beyond kinetic attacks. The conflict has seen a significant increase in cyber warfare, with both sides reportedly engaging in offensive and defensive digital operations. This digital front has had tangible impacts, adding to the disruption and chaos of the physical war.

5.1. The Shadow War Comes to Light

One notable incident that brought the shadow war into the public eye was a cyberattack that caused a blackout at an Iranian facility. While Israel does not claim responsibility for such incidents, Israeli media widely reported that the government orchestrated a cyberattack that caused a blackout at the facility. This unacknowledged but widely reported cyber offensive highlights the sophisticated and multi-faceted nature of the conflict. Furthermore, NetBlocks, a connectivity monitor, has reported that Iran has suffered from repeated internet blackouts, adding to the severe internet disruptions and cyberattacks in Iran since the war began. These cyber operations serve multiple purposes: to disrupt critical infrastructure, gather intelligence, and sow confusion, all while maintaining a degree of plausible deniability. The integration of cyber warfare into the overall military strategy signifies a modern approach to conflict, where digital battlefields are as crucial as physical ones. This expansion into the cyber domain further illustrates the comprehensive nature of the current hostilities and offers another perspective on what started the Iran War in its contemporary form.

6. The American Stance: A Complex Alliance

The United States' role and stance in the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel are critical, adding another layer of complexity to understanding what started the Iran War and its potential trajectory. The U.S. has a long-standing strategic alliance with Israel, providing significant military and diplomatic support. However, the prospect of direct American involvement in a Middle Eastern war raises serious concerns, both domestically and internationally. Questions like "Is America going to war with Iran?" have become increasingly pertinent as the conflict deepens. Former President Trump's statements, in particular, have drawn attention. Since Israel struck Iran last week, Trump has made comments that suggest a strong alignment with Israeli actions. He notably threatened Iran’s Supreme Leader and referred to Israel’s war efforts using the word “we,” signs that indicate a deeply intertwined relationship and potential for U.S. engagement. Conversely, Iran has explicitly warned the U.S. against joining the attack, underscoring the high stakes involved. The U.S. finds itself in a delicate balancing act: supporting its ally while trying to prevent a broader regional conflagration that could have global repercussions. The degree of American support, whether overt or covert, and its diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation, will significantly influence the course of this conflict, making the U.S. position a vital component of the narrative of what started the Iran War and where it might lead.

7. The Human Cost: Civilians in the Crosshairs

As with any large-scale military conflict, the most tragic and enduring impact of what started the Iran War is borne by the civilian populations. The provided data explicitly states that the civilian populations of both nations are bearing the brunt of the conflict. In Tel Aviv and Tehran, rescue crews are tirelessly looking for survivors in piles of rubble, a stark and heartbreaking image of the destruction unleashed. This immediate human toll underscores the devastating reality of modern warfare, where urban centers become battlegrounds and ordinary lives are irrevocably altered. The echoes of past conflicts, like the 'war of the cities' during the Iran-Iraq War, where hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed, serve as a grim reminder of the potential for widespread suffering. The current missile and air war, which Israel and Iran have spent decades planning for, has indeed come, and it is spectacular in its destructive capacity. However, beneath the spectacle of military might lies the profound human tragedy of families displaced, homes destroyed, and lives lost. The focus on strategic objectives and military capabilities often overshadows the immense suffering of those caught in the crossfire. Recognizing this profound human cost is essential for a complete understanding of the ramifications of what started the Iran War and the urgent need for de-escalation and peace.

8. A New Era of Direct Confrontation

The current conflict marks a significant and dangerous turning point in the long-standing rivalry between Iran and Israel. This is the first time both countries have gone to a direct conflict since 2024, but on a massive scale. For decades, the animosity played out through proxy groups, covert operations, and cyber warfare. The missile and air war that Israel and Iran have spent decades planning for has come, and it is spectacular in its intensity and reach. This shift from a shadow war to open confrontation fundamentally alters the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. It signifies a new era where the rules of engagement have changed, and the risks of miscalculation and widespread regional conflict have dramatically increased. The events of June 12th and 13th, with Operation Rising Lion and Iran's subsequent missile salvoes, have unequivocally established a direct military front. The world is now witnessing the culmination of years of escalating tensions, where the question of what started the Iran War is answered not by a single event, but by a confluence of historical grievances, strategic imperatives, and a calculated decision by both sides to engage directly. This new phase demands global attention and concerted efforts to prevent further escalation, as the implications extend far beyond the immediate combatants.

In conclusion, understanding what started the Iran War is not a simple matter of identifying a single trigger event. It is a complex narrative woven from decades of geopolitical rivalry, the persistent threat of Iran's nuclear program, and a series of escalating military actions and retaliations. From Israel's decisive Operation Rising Lion on June 12th, targeting Iran's strategic assets, to Iran's swift and impactful missile responses, the conflict has rapidly transformed from a shadow war into a full-blown direct confrontation. The involvement of cyber warfare, the historical context of regional conflicts, and the looming presence of global powers like the United States all contribute to the intricate tapestry of this unfolding crisis. The human cost, evident in the rubble of Tel Aviv and Tehran, serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of this direct conflict.

As the world grapples with this new reality, staying informed and understanding the multifaceted origins of this war becomes paramount. What are your thoughts on the primary drivers of this conflict? Share your perspectives in the comments below, and consider sharing this article to help others grasp the complexities of what started the Iran War. For more insights into regional geopolitics, explore other related articles on our site.

In U.S.-Led Iraq War, Iran Was the Big Winner - The New York Times

After Iran's missile attacks on Israel – will a wider war ensue?

US Confronts Iran on Protests, Ukraine and Nuclear Enrichment - The New

Designed To Delight